With the increased global demand for oil and gas, undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources. To what extent do you agree?

It is often argued that the world should open up untouched regions to meet the growing demand for oil and gas. I completely disagree with

this

Linking Words

view, as

such

Linking Words

exploration would cause severe environmental degradation and deepen global dependence on fossil fuels. Expanding exploration into previously unspoiled areas would inflict irreversible harm on the planet’s biodiversity. To obtain short-term

energy

Use synonyms

supplies, vast ecosystems must be cleared, releasing harmful greenhouse gases and accelerating climate change.

This

Linking Words

not only destroys habitats but

also

Linking Words

threatens the survival of countless species.

For instance

Linking Words

, extensive drilling in Central Asia between the 1970s and 1990s led to significant deforestation and air pollution, drastically reducing the populations of native flora and fauna.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, the continuous pursuit of new fossil reserves fosters unsustainable consumption habits. When societies rely on discovering fresh oil and gas fields, they neglect investment in renewable alternatives

such

Linking Words

as solar or wind

energy

Use synonyms

. A recent report by the World Nature Conservancy warned that the global expansion of fossil-fuel extraction is increasing by nearly 9% annually, delaying progress toward clean

energy

Use synonyms

innovation. In conclusion,

although

Linking Words

energy

Use synonyms

demand is undeniably rising, exploiting untouched lands is a short-sighted solution. Governments should

instead

Linking Words

prioritise renewable

energy

Use synonyms

development to safeguard the environment and reduce dependence on finite fossil resources.