Many people feel it a waste of money to try to save the endangered animal species, for example the tiger or the blue whale. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.

✍️ Want to check your own essay?Get started →
A large part of the population believes that using money to try to preserve endangered animal
species
Use synonyms
is unnecessary. Critics think that money should be spent on solving global problems
such
Linking Words
as poverty or pollution.
However
Linking Words
, I strongly disagree with
this
Linking Words
perspective, as investing in wildlife preservation is a vital step for maintaining global ecological stability. On the one hand, the opponents of wildlife funding argue that it is financially reckless to preserve a single
species
Use synonyms
of animal when there are millions of humans who suffer from poverty. Human welfare is crucial;
this
Linking Words
argument assumes that human survival is independent of the natural world.
For instance
Linking Words
, protecting tigers requires preserving vast forest areas.
This
Linking Words
, in turn, saves the natural watersheds that supply clean drinking water to millions of humans. In reality, neglecting the biosphere to solve short-term human crises is a strategy that leads to greater long-term economic disasters.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, the financial investment required to save endangered
species
Use synonyms
is entirely justified when considering the concept of ecosystem services. Predators like tigers and marine giants like blue whales play irreplaceable roles in their habitats.
For example
Linking Words
, blue whales contribute significantly to ocean
fertilization
Change the spelling
fertilisation
show examples
, stimulating the growth of phytoplankton, which absorbs immense volumes of carbon dioxide.
Therefore
Linking Words
, funding wildlife conservation is, in essence, a highly cost-effective method of combating climate change and preventing the collapse of ecosystems on which human agriculture and economies depend. In conclusion, I completely disagree with the notion that funding the preservation of endangered
species
Use synonyms
is a waste of money. Far from being an expensive ecological hobby, conservation is a critical investment in the planetary infrastructure that sustains human life. Governments should increase, rather than diminish, financial commitments to environmental protection to ensure a sustainable future.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Make one idea in each body part a little more easy to follow with shorter steps.
coherence cohesion
Use a few more linking words like 'first', 'also', and 'as a result' to guide the reader.
task achievement
Add one more direct example in one body part to make your point even stronger.
task achievement
Keep your main view clear in every part, not only in the start and end.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear start, middle, and end.
coherence cohesion
Your main ideas are well supported and stay on the topic.
task achievement
You answer the question fully and give a clear opinion.
task achievement
Your examples about forests and whales fit the topic well.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • endangered species
  • biodiversity
  • intrinsic value
  • existential threat
  • ecosystem
  • conservation
  • economic benefits
  • funding allocation
  • competing needs
What to do next:
Look at other essays: