Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport system such as railways and tram. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

8.0 / 9
✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
Introduction
Some people argue that governments should prioritise
roads
Use synonyms
and motorways over public
transport
Use synonyms
such
Linking Words
as railways and trams. I strongly disagree, because investment in public
transport
Use synonyms
offers far greater long-term benefits for society.
Body paragraph 1
Admittedly,
roads
Use synonyms
are indispensable. Goods are delivered by lorry, emergency vehicles depend on well-maintained routes, and rural communities often have no alternative to the car. Neglecting road maintenance would
therefore
Linking Words
damage economic activity and public safety.
Body paragraph 2
However
Linking Words
, building ever more motorways is a short-sighted solution to congestion. New
roads
Use synonyms
tend to attract additional vehicles, so traffic soon returns to its previous level, a phenomenon known as induced demand.
By contrast
Linking Words
, a single tram or train can carry hundreds of passengers, removing a significant number of cars from the road. Cities
such
Linking Words
as Zurich, where an efficient rail and tram network is used daily by a majority of commuters, enjoy far smoother travel than many car-dependent metropolises.
Body paragraph 3
Environmental and social considerations strengthen
this
Linking Words
argument.
Transport
Use synonyms
is a major source of carbon emissions, and electric trains and trams produce far less pollution per passenger than private cars. Cleaner air reduces respiratory illness and,
consequently
Linking Words
, healthcare costs.
Moreover
Linking Words
, public
transport
Use synonyms
is affordable and accessible to people who cannot drive or own a vehicle,
such
Linking Words
as students, the elderly, and low-income workers.
This
Linking Words
widens access to jobs and education, promoting equality of opportunity.
Body paragraph 4
Finally
Linking Words
,
although
Linking Words
railways require high initial investment, they are cost-effective over time, as they serve millions of passengers for decades and reduce spending on road repairs, accident treatment, and traffic management.
Conclusion
In conclusion,
while
Linking Words
roads
Use synonyms
remain necessary, governments should give priority to public
transport
Use synonyms
. It is more efficient, sustainable, and inclusive, and it offers a lasting solution to the problems of modern urban mobility.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Your view is very clear from the start, and you answer the whole question. To make the case even stronger, you could say more clearly when roads should still get more money, for example in small towns or for urgent road repair.
task response
Your main ideas are well explained: less traffic, cleaner air, fair access, and lower cost over time. The Zurich example is useful, but make sure any fact about a city is fully true and easy to support. One more simple example from your own country could add force.
coherence and cohesion
The essay has a very clear path: roads are needed, public transport has more value, then you give a final view. Each paragraph has one main point. You can make the link into the cost paragraph a little smoother by showing that cost is also part of the long-term choice.
coherence and cohesion
Linking words such as 'However', 'By contrast', 'Moreover', and 'Finally' are used well. Do not add more of them; the writing already moves in a natural way. You could use a short link back to the main view at the end of each body paragraph for even stronger flow.
task response
You take a firm view and keep it through the whole essay. You also show that you understand the other side before explaining why public transport should come first.
task response
The ideas are full and useful. The points about air, health, work, school, and people who cannot drive make the answer wide and human.
coherence and cohesion
The opening and ending match very well. The final paragraph gives a clear and direct answer to the question.
coherence and cohesion
Paragraphs are in a strong order, and each one builds on the last. This makes the essay easy to read and follow.
Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: