Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age, for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that raising the minimum age at which people can drive cars or ride motorbikes will improve
safety. While I agree that
will somewhat solve the problem, more efforts should be put into nurturing people’s awareness of
problems and the feasible consequences thereof. On the one hand, raising the bar to the legal driving age could reduce the incidents of reckless driving on the
make sure that the
is safe enough for everyone.
is because many teenagers do not take full responsibility for their own and other’s safety and often commit driving offences. Even if they cause
accidents, they just do not have enough legal capacity to be responsible for those accidents and the ones who suffer injuries or even fatalities therefrom.
For example
, in Vietnam, there have been cases where teenagers do not wear helmets, speed and ride their motorbikes in the wrong lanes. These teenagers,
, are not incarcerated if they crashed and kill other people.
On the other hand
, to change the situation for the better in the long run, people should be educated about the consequences of driving carelessly. Images and billboards that feature real-life consequences of
accidents might be displayed on
the roads
where accidents often take place.
visual evidence might deter people from driving recklessly and causing accidents.
, schools at all levels could be asked to have training programs about
rules in their curricula and these should be repeated every year so that the rules can be embedded in students’ minds. These programs might
culminate in projects where students apply what they have learned to spread their awareness
their communities. In conclusion,
restricting the number of people who can drive by their age can make the experience on the
safer for everyone, it is more important that people be educated about what they can and cannot do.
Submitted by s.tung1994 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

What to do next:
Look at other essays:
  • It is true that there has been a rise in the number of people who get married and have babies in their mid 30s and beyond. In my opinion, this is a beneficial practice because at this age most parents are financially stable and emotionally mature to raise their children properly and ensure a better future for them.
  • Some feel that the countryside is more conducive to a healthy lifestyle than the city. Though cities offer modern hospitals, I am in agreement with this sentiment as the countryside encourages greater activity.
  • The government surveillance is a well-known concept. Even kings and queens from every kingdom had a somebody who was in charge to keep everything going smooth in their area. For instance, everybody had to pay money to the king, and they did not be allow to say a bad work against him. On the other hand, the king’s army was protecting people and whole kingdom.
  • Nowadays, old aged people living with their own families or living in special communities have become one of the trending and noteworthy topics. Some people think they should be with their children and some people believe that they should be living in special accommodations which are existed for them. There are various reasons behind these opinions. In my opinion, it is more suitable and better for elderly people to live with their own children as far as their children can afford a healthy and comfortable atmosphere for them.
  • If we define culture as shared beliefs, values, attitudes and behaviours, it stands to reason then that a person's country of origin impacts their culture. The question is to what degree. Is nationality the defining influence or is it just one of many factors in play? Personally speaking, I would say both arguments have validity, but I would lean towards the latter. It is easy to understand the ‘defining influence’ argument. If someone is born and raised in a place, they will be heavily influenced by it. Psychologists refer to this as the ‘nurture argument’ - you are a product of your environment. For example, if your country's cuisine uses certain ingredients, your palate gets accustomed to those ingredients, but may struggle with other less familiar flavours. If your country has a traditional style of music, say, reggae or rock, all citizens will be exposed to it and, as a result, are more likely to enjoy it. On the other side of the argument we need to consider the effects of globalisation. Most people have daily access and exposure to other cultures. The evidence is all around us- restaurants, films and foreign businesses are ubiquitous. One of the benefits of globalisation is that it offers us a selection of cultural possibilities to choose from. It is unlikely that you will find any citizen of a certain country who does not have likes or preferences that come from outside of their country of origin. In addition, more and more people work, study or travel extensively away from their home country. Inevitably, these people will be subject to new influences. My own view is that while we are influenced by our nationality, in this globalised world, one's country of origin is only one aspect of our collective culture. We all adopt elements from other cultures on a daily basis, unconsciously or according to our preferences and experiences. To my mind, this is what makes the world such an interesting place.