Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today, because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer. Do you agree or disagree?

It is true that technology gives most people a chance to see historical objects and works of
art
on a computer screen. I partly agree with the view,
therefore
,
Accept space
,
that museums and
art
that galleries are no longer necessary. It is very expensive to maintain a museum or
art
gallery, and governments often have to provide funding for these institutions. If national or local authorities have to allocate resources to keep these cultural facilities open,
then
less money is available to spend on health, education and social services. Faced with
such
a choice, some countries opt for a mixed funding model for the arts in order to reduce costs.
Therefore
, I believe that it is an unaffordable luxury to retain these wonderful public collections. Their
artifacts
a man-made object taken as a whole
artefacts
and paintings can all be accessed freely and almost instantly at the touch of a key on a computer keyboard. While I agree that museums and
art
galleries are not essential in
this
computer age, I would be sad to see their disappearance.
Firstly
, the buildings which house their collections are themselves part of our tangible cultural heritage.
For example
, the National Gallery in London is a striking and impressive
historic
Suggestion
historical
building.
Secondly
, the feeling of awe on seeing the size of the great dinosaur skeletons in the Natural History Museum in New York would be impossible to experience by simply looking at an image on a laptop or cell phone. It would be an immense loss if
such
places were to close their doors to the public. In conclusion,
although
these cultural facilities have unique aesthetic qualities, now that people ca
n ace
the right to enter
access
ss their treasures thanks to the digital revolution, the expense of keeping them open cannot be justified
Submitted by naresh on

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next: