In many cities, planners tend to arrange shops, schools, offices, and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other. Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages.

The urban planning replaces shops, schools, offices, and homes into specific areas. I am the opinion of the disadvantages are eclipsed by the advantages. It is undeniable that there are some drawbacks to some extent in terms of budget and environment. Regarding the former, it spends a lot of money in resettlement for people living in these urban-planned areas rather than allocating budget to invest in the education system. If the urban planning legislation has unforeseen issues, which influences negatively on resident’ daily life in transportation and accommodation
besides
a huge amount of money is wasted. The other major point is environmental pollution when the new construction is carried out, the
first
stage is the destruction of existing urban
infrastructures creating
Accept comma addition
infrastructures, creating
a vast disposed waste which puts a heavy burden on the environment of these areas,
also
, the waste-disposed products from the new building projects in the construction stage exacerbates the pollution. Despite the aforementioned argument, the legislation is more
substantial related to the
Suggestion
related to the substantial
financial management and tourist destination. The
first
contribution is that it is more suitable for authority to manage the business when they gather in specific areas about taxes and sales and increase the competitiveness between the shops have the same products being able to valorize. Another thing is the convenience of logical rearrangement advances the urban face compared to other cities, which becomes a tourist attraction,
for example
, Singapore is one of the most metropolitan having reasonable urban planning policy, which attract the most tourisms each year in Asia. In conclusion,
although
there are a lot of concerning drawbacks, I believe
this
policy should be implemented as the positive effects do outweigh the issues it brings.
Submitted by Thanh on

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next: