Earlier technological developments were more beneficial and changed the lives of the ordinary people than recent technology ever will. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Older advancements in technology were more efficient and it transformed the lives of the ordinary people than current technology will. In my opinion

,

Accept space

,

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

completely disagree with

this

assertion as they were very slow and it required more expertise to carry out

.

Accept space

.

A major reason why the electronic gadgets used in the olden days were not productive was because they were not fast in delivering. To

further

explain, when a message is to be delivered, before it is processed and taken to the intended recipient, a lot of time would have been spent

,

Accept space

,

thereby delaying the purpose of the message

.

Accept space

.

For example

,

Accept space

,

when delivery was to be done using Postal box, two weeks to one month should have gone by, before the message is delivered.

Hence

this

made it ineffective. Another important point to consider is that most of the employers required a lot of trainings to perform their duties.To

further

simplify, due to the low literacy level seen at the time, most of the workers were not able to discharge their duties effectively.

Consequently

,

this

stalled their performance

.

Accept space

.

For instance

, hybrid

computers which

Accept comma addition

computers, which

was

Suggestion

were

in operation during the early 1900's, needed a lot of trained personnels to be able to operate It. Because people were not literate enough it

,

Accept space

,

it led to

further

decline in the rate of technological use

.

Accept space

.

To conclude, previous advances in technology never yielded a good outcome more than

this

present technological

devices

Suggestion

device

as the older system had need of hands on trainings to handle its activities and it was unreliable.