we cannot help everyone in the world that needs helps, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

First

of all, it is clearly fanciful that we can help all the needy people in the run the cosmos.

Further

, every country or each one faces a lot of problems, and in most those the issues of deficit the budget is an important obstacle to aim for giving opportunities to people for a better life with more amenities. Should the governments or each person helps to other people in the macrocosm, it would be hard to attend their people or their life.

Consequently

, it could be causing problems

such

as expand destitute, jobless and so on.

Second

of all, there are different ways that do not necessarily need government or persons for helping to the people who are needing it.

In other words

, should they tend to help the other people, they would help to them by own expense.

Furthermore

, for

this

case, international and regional institutions and organization were created by a group of countries.

For example

, the red cross or red crescent has helped the people who hand to mouth in the run the vale.

Likewise

, the people have suffered from war or natural disasters.

Thus

, these institutions can boost the deprived people better than others. In conclusion, as I have noted above, I believe that the useful initiative in supporting the needy people, is using international and regional supportive institution.

Next

, it would be wrong to use governmental aids for

this

purpose. Only in

this

way could have been supporting to survive the divested people.