Some people think that you can never become fluent in a language unless you have spent time living or working in that country. To what extend do you agree?

Learning a new

language

from textbooks and applying grammar rules, which are the essence, but not necessarily enough. Using it with a native speaker is what ensures

language

fluency

. I strongly concur with the need for an extensive period of the

language

used in context.    To start with, using the

language

is a skill you can acquire, which is crucial to understand the cultural aspect of a country, but it is not enough without living a couple of months and

use

it with

locals

Suggestion

the locals

.

For instance

, in Italy, people there

use

their non-verbal to express themselves.

Although

you will be using the appropriate verbs or sentence structure, but not enough to fluently speak the Italian dialect without using hand gestures.

Therefore

, living and communicating with citizens is essential to have a natural flow of

language

.    Another reason for the need to

use

the

language

in the original country over a period, which gives the opportunity to

use

the correct terminologies in context, permit gaining

fluency

. To illustrate

this

, being able to

use

the

language

to purchase your daily products or using it in a professional setting by using the appropriate word aids in verbal

fluency

.

Thus

socializing on a daily basis allows better acquisition of verbal communication.    In conclusion, I strongly agree that culture builds an excellent way to

use

the appropriate word in a situation

that is

better than that taken from any course. Living in a region that uses that

language

you will know and understand how people

use

their native words in their daily life.

Moreover

, using the correct word in context while daily communication a key to ensuring

language

fluency

.