Some people think that the effective way to reduce pollution is to tax the companies which cause it. Others think that there are better ways to achieve this. Discuss both the sides and give your own opinion.

Pollution

Use synonyms

in almost all parts of the world has become a menace to humans and various solutions have been proposed to overcome it. While some people suggest taxing the

corporates

an essential structural component of living cells and source of energy for animals; includes simple sugars with small molecules as well as macromolecular substances; are classified according to the number of monosaccharide groups they contain

carbohydrates

since they generate

pollution

Use synonyms

while producing goods, others think that measures

such

Linking Words

as public awareness and regulation are more effective. I agree with the latter view. Imposing heavy taxes on companies is an efficient way to reduce as well as

control

a workplace that serves as a telecommunications facility where lines from telephones can be connected together to permit communication

central

air, water and ground

pollution

Use synonyms

.

Accept space

.

Governments can use these taxes to create a fund that helps implement

pollution

Use synonyms

control measures

such

Linking Words

as effluent treatment plants.

Moreover

Linking Words

, taxes will increase the price of goods in the

market which

Accept comma addition

market, which

will reduce the consumption and

hence

Linking Words

pollution

Use synonyms

.

For example

Linking Words

, the government of Singapore has imposed heavy taxes on all manufacturing facilities and used these funds to clean rivers, install machines to absorb harmful gases in Singapore’s air.

Thus

Linking Words

a heavy tax on companies has played an important role in making Singapore a clean place to live.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, some people suggest that taxes are not an effective way to reduce

pollution

Use synonyms

and stringent

pollution

Use synonyms

regulation and public awareness are more important

.

Accept space

.

Strong oversight of environmentally hazardous industries

such

Linking Words

as paper and plastic by regulators will be an effective step in controlling

pollution

Use synonyms

.

Moreover

Linking Words

, if people are aware of environmental impacts of products through measurements

such

Linking Words

as ecological footprint, they will purchase products that are less polluting

.

Accept space

.

In conclusion, I believe that heavy tax on companies is not an effective way to reduce

pollution

Use synonyms

since it translates to increase in prices of goods which eventually harm the consumers. Governments should strictly regulate the polluting industries and make

public aware

Suggestion

the public aware

of

pollution

Use synonyms

emitted by any product.

This

Linking Words

will not only make people more aware of their duty to protect their environment, but

also

Linking Words

make Earth a sustainable place to live.