Some people think that the effective way to reduce pollution is to tax the companies which cause it. Others think that there are better ways to achieve this. Discuss both the sides and give your own opinion.

Pollution
in almost all parts of the world has become a menace to humans and various solutions have been proposed to overcome it. While some people suggest taxing the
corporates
an essential structural component of living cells and source of energy for animals; includes simple sugars with small molecules as well as macromolecular substances; are classified according to the number of monosaccharide groups they contain
carbohydrates
since they generate
pollution
while producing goods, others think that measures
such
as public awareness and regulation are more effective. I agree with the latter view. Imposing heavy taxes on companies is an efficient way to reduce as well as
control
a workplace that serves as a telecommunications facility where lines from telephones can be connected together to permit communication
central
air, water and ground
pollution
.
Accept space
.
Governments can use these taxes to create a fund that helps implement
pollution
control measures
such
as effluent treatment plants.
Moreover
, taxes will increase the price of goods in the
market which
Accept comma addition
market, which
will reduce the consumption and
hence
pollution
.
For example
, the government of Singapore has imposed heavy taxes on all manufacturing facilities and used these funds to clean rivers, install machines to absorb harmful gases in Singapore’s air.
Thus
a heavy tax on companies has played an important role in making Singapore a clean place to live.
On the other hand
, some people suggest that taxes are not an effective way to reduce
pollution
and stringent
pollution
regulation and public awareness are more important
.
Accept space
.
Strong oversight of environmentally hazardous industries
such
as paper and plastic by regulators will be an effective step in controlling
pollution
.
Moreover
, if people are aware of environmental impacts of products through measurements
such
as ecological footprint, they will purchase products that are less polluting
.
Accept space
.
In conclusion, I believe that heavy tax on companies is not an effective way to reduce
pollution
since it translates to increase in prices of goods which eventually harm the consumers. Governments should strictly regulate the polluting industries and make
public aware
Suggestion
the public aware
of
pollution
emitted by any product.
This
will not only make people more aware of their duty to protect their environment, but
also
make Earth a sustainable place to live.
Submitted by jiwa on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!
Topic Vocabulary:
  • financial deterrent
  • adopt cleaner technologies
  • emissions
  • environmental impact
  • standards
  • emission caps
  • pollution control devices
  • green technologies
  • sustainable practices
  • subsidies
  • eco-friendly solutions
  • punitive measures
  • public awareness campaigns
  • consumer pressure
  • environmental footprint
  • sustainable practices
  • stricter enforcement
  • severe penalties
  • combined approach
  • combat industrial pollution
What to do next:
Look at other essays: