Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is no doubt that art is important, but it is debatable whether it should be sponsored by the

government

. Some insist that the

government

is wasting

money

on the arts. In their opinion, there are many useful things that need to be focused rather than emphasizing the arts. I agree with

this

opinion. For one thing, arts promotions and events can be organized by many other private organizations or society clubs and you do not really need a

government

intervention to run the show. There are many clubs

such

as Lion’s club or YMCC clubs that can take the initiative and sponsor

such

events.

For example

, a music program or an exhibition of paintings can be organized by a local club and there is no need for the

government

to sponsor it. There are

also

many rich people who take pleasure in sponsoring art shows and programmes. When the

government

does not have to spend

money

on arts it can focus on developing core areas like education, healthcare and infrastructure. Poverty, illiteracy and malnutrition are still a major problem in many countries around the world.

For example

, in India, millions of students still do not go to school.

Likewise

, there are numerous homeless people.

Therefore

,

instead

of spending the public funds on

arts

Suggestion

the arts

, the

government

should try to improve the health of its people. It should ensure that all children are going to school and they have access to good food and potable water. In conclusion, while arts events and programmes are important for the society, they should not be sponsored by the tax

money

contributed by people. The

government

should focus on more important areas and use its

money

for the benefit and upliftment of the human society.