In the contemporary world, more than half of the population is suffering from the hunger and poverty. Some people are saying that the rapid growth of the economic development is the only way to end
this
situation, while others are arguing that Linking Words
this
should be stopped immediately as it's destructing the environment. Following essay will discuss both aspects of Linking Words
this
argument and outline my opinion on the same.
Linking Words
To begin
with, economic growth shows a certain country's wealth. Proliferation of economic success will mitigate their unemployment, Linking Words
hence
it will boost people's standards of living. Linking Words
For example
, most of the developing countries, Linking Words
such
as India and Bangladesh are suffering from hunger and poverty, the only way to diminish Linking Words
this
problem is that the authorities should take necessary actions to bring up the commercial growth.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, the rapid development of a nation could bring detrimental impacts to the environment. Linking Words
For example
, waste comes out from industrial zones increases the greenhouse gas emission which will be a direct impact to the global warming. Linking Words
For example
, current climate change situations throughout the globe is a consequence of Linking Words
this
impact. Linking Words
Furthermore
, actions Linking Words
such
as deforestation to cultivate crops will destroy natural habitat and imbalance the nature of the natural world.
In conclusion, the tremendous commercial improvement can be a cause to end the hunger and poverty of a nation. Linking Words
Therefore
, I strongly believe that the governments should take necessary steps to prevent side effects which could cause the pollution along with Linking Words
this
expansion, Linking Words
that is
how a country can protect the environment, while improving their economy up.Linking Words