Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Punishing people who commit crimes is crucial to maintain law and order in society. Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of

crime

. Others

belives

Suggestion

believe

believes

have believed

that

this

is not logical there are some other

factors you

Accept comma addition

factors, you

also

need to take into consideration before giving verdict

such

as circumstances, the

motive

behind the

crime

, etc. On the side of the argument, some people benefit from adopting a fixed

punishment

structure for its crimes committed considerably

outway

be heavier than

outweigh

its disadvantages.

This

is because a fixed

punishment

structure will save a lot of time and money that could be spent

otherwise

on some other community services

such

as education,

healthcare

Suggestion

health care

, etc. Criminals will think twice before doing any

crim

(criminal law) an act punishable by law; usually considered an evil act

crime

crimes

since the

punishment

is fixed. It will

also

decrease the

crime

rate.

On the other hand

, it seems quite inappropriate. Human

behavior

manner of acting or controlling yourself

behaviour

has different flaws. There is always some intention behind committing any

crime

. To judge a fair verdict, the

motive

needs to be taken into consideration

also

circumstances will come

to

Suggestion

into

picture when the

motive

is defined. Consider a person who kills people have no other

motive

. Someone tries to attack and in

defense

(military) military action or resources protecting a country against potential enemies

defence

, the defender hunts the attacker

then

the

motive

is different. He/She is trying to save himself/herself. It cannot be said that he/she is a murderer. Because the

motive

makes the difference between the same actions. To give judgment

properly

Suggestion

proper

based on any

crime

, the

motive

seems to play a vital role so a fixed

punishment

for each type of

crime

seems not valid. I agree that fixed punishments for each type of

crime

is not a valid scenario for judging and some other facts

also

need to be considered.