Some people say that public libraries are an important public resource and should be free. Others say that they are just a waste of public money. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

While it is argued that

pulic

not private; open to or concerning the people as a whole

public

libraries are an essential asset for societies and their services should be provided free of charge, others argue that these institutions are a burden on

tax payers

someone who pays taxes

taxpayers

. In

this

essay I will defend both sides of the argument, and

then

I will show my own perspective. On the one hand, some people argue that public libraries help society members to acquire knowledge easily.

In addition

to that, these institutions act as an archive for all kinds of information, especially local achievements which motivate society members to get better education and aspire

for

Suggestion

to

further

success.

Consequently

, these libraries should continue to benefit from public funds and ought to be accessible

for

Suggestion

to

all community

memebers

one of the persons who compose a social group (especially individuals who have joined and participate in a group organization)

members

without entrance fees.

For example

, numerous studies have concluded that, nations which have more free public libraries per capita obtained higher education levels and scientific achievements per inhabitant than countries with fewer public libraries.

On the other hand

, other people argue that the modern

technoligical

based in scientific and industrial progress

technological

advancements could provide other educational resources without wasting the government's money. Resources like public internet access could achieve the same level of benefits while costing much less.

Moreover

, spending the excess money to improve other public facilities like schools and

praks

a large area of land preserved in its natural state as public property

parks

Parks

, could prove to be more beneficial for societies.

Hence

, some people think that it is possible to minimize public spending on libraries without

compromizing

making or willing to make concessions

compromising

the

education

Suggestion

educational

quality. In conclusion, while some people think that we should spend less money on public libraries and look for technological solutions to

maintaine

keep in a certain state, position, or activity; e.g., "keep clean"

maintain

the same benefits, others argue that public libraries are still important to societies on many levels, especially when it comes to highlighting local achievements. In my opinion, public libraries are an essential part of any society, and their benefits could not be compensated in other ways.