Introduction
It is often suggested that affluent countries should provide supplies to impoverished countries that are experiencing natural disasters. I agree with
this
view because it is a moral obligation and it reduces the spread of diseases.Linking Words
Body · 1
Provision of humanitarian relief to poor states during natural disasters is the right thing to do. Humans have a conscience that prompts us to come to the aid of those who are suffering.
As a result
, nations that have the means to address the unfortunate situations caused by nature in poorer states view the provisions of assistance as appropriate. Linking Words
For instance
, after the 2009 Haiti earthquake, the developed regions of the world agreed that it is necessary to provide supplies to the island to mitigate the challenges faced by the people.Linking Words
Body · 2
Furthermore
, Linking Words
such
assistance help to curtail the transmission of infections. After a major natural catastrophe Linking Words
such
as tsunami and flood, people lose their basic means of live like housing, food, portable water and health care. If these basic needs are not available, diseases quickly develop and spread within the same impoverished region and to other countries. Linking Words
However
, with the humanitarian aids from affluent countries, infections will be curtailed. Linking Words
For example
, a recent UNICEF report attributed the success in reducing diarrhoea in northeast Nigeria after flooding to donations from the UK and the US.Linking Words
Conclusion
In conclusion, rich countries should provide humanitarian reliefs to poor nations during natural disasters, as it is the appropriate moral step to take and it reduce the transmission of diseases. Efforts geared towards educating policy makers in various countries about
this
opinion should be promoted.Linking Words