Smacking children is the best form of discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that corporal

punishment

works better for children. These people claim that physical

punishment

is the most efficient way to teach

discipline

to youngsters.

This

essay will argue why beating children

is

Suggestion

are

have been

are being

never the right way to instil

discipline

in them. A few parents are overly concerned about disciplining their children. They insist that smacking will develop fear in the mind of the children and help them to keep them under control.

However

,

this

argument does not much water. Smacking might help in the short turn, but parents who regularly beat their children will eventually lose their support.

Hence

the idea that

smacking

the act of smoking tobacco or other substances

smoking

is extremely important for

discipline

is completely preposterous. Smacking children

directly affects

Suggestion

directly affect

their brain and in the long run makes them rebellious.

Furthermore

,

instead

of forcing

discipline

on them, parents should teach it in a polite way. Studies have

also

shown that children who learn

discipline

on their own are less likely to waver from the right path even when they are tempted to do so.

By contrast

, those who learned

discipline

for fear of

punishment

will willingly choose the right path if they get a chance. Overall, the idea that smacking children is vital is ill-informed and dangerous in itself and could potentially lead to a far worse outcome for the society. In conclusion,

this

essay argued that people who are in favour of spanking

punishment

have a flawed understanding of

punishment

and they are wrongly

linking

Suggestion

linked

it to

discipline

. In my opinion, smacking a child the name of

discipline

is completely unacceptable. There are various other ways to teach

discipline

to youth.