To solve the ever-increasing environmental hazards throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of fuel. What is your opinion on the above assumption? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

Of late, the increasing influx of vehicles poses a great menace to the environment across the world. Many assert that rising oil prices would probably eliminate some dangers to the ecosystem.

Nevertheless

Linking Words

, in my opinion,

this

Linking Words

idea is an ineffective one which would rather adversely affect the common people. On the one hand, it is true that the fuel price increment might reduce the usage of vehicles to some extent.

This

Linking Words

is because middle class people will approach public transports and other alternatives at lower costs. It may result in the control of the emission of smoke and gases that hugely damages the living world.

Thus

Linking Words

, it might prevent

further

Linking Words

environmental degradation.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, it is undeniable that

this

Linking Words

tendency may make a trivial impact as most of the cars and vehicles are owned by the rich.

For instance

Linking Words

, New Delhi, the capital of India, where the government has recently amended

this

Linking Words

act, still stands taller in the list of highly polluted cities.

In addition

Linking Words

, even if the rates of oils are skyrocketing, the wealthy car owners can still afford it.

Hence

Linking Words

, I would say that it will hardly yield a desired outcome. I

also

Linking Words

believe that

this

Linking Words

trend would contrarily exert influence in commoners' life. Owing to a hefty fuel, toll, the diverse range of trades will surely be affected which would eventually rise the fare of basic necessities.

Moreover

Linking Words

, the factors

such

Linking Words

as deforestation, industrial emissions and so on primarily cause a great havoc on the natural world.

For example

Linking Words

, the more people vandalize the forests, the worse the effects will be. So, it is baseless to implement

this

Linking Words

act into society.  To conclude, as

this

Linking Words

is incoherent due to its negligible (insignificant) positive result, the governments should come up forward with constructive measures in order to prevent detrimental effects on the ecosystem.