More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Do you agree or disagree?

When considering the movement of professional workers to rich countries, one should bear in mind the complexity of the issue. Some people believe

this

movement is part of the normal shifts happening in the international job market. Others, including myself, think that encouraging people with professional experience to work in developed countries in order to gain a higher salary is immoral and should be regulated. In the following essay, I will provide arguments and examples to support my opinion. Encouraging qualified

personal

Suggestion

persons

from underdeveloped and poor countries to move to richer areas, increase the

economical

Suggestion

economic

and financial differences, and prevents nations from developing their economy. When qualified personal like physicians, teachers and

engeneers

a person who uses scientific knowledge to solve practical problems

engineers

are encouraged to migrate to countries with better paying positions, a vacancy is formed which is unfortunately occupied by lesser

experiecne

the accumulation of knowledge or skill that results from direct participation in events or activities

experience

personal.

Consequently

, the quality of work is damaged,

further

widening the differences between the countries.

This

can be seen in

Hungary where

Accept comma addition

Hungary, where

many medical physicians were offered a position in

Germeny

a republic in central Europe; split into East Germany and West Germany after World War II and reunited in 1990

Germany

in the

last

10 years.

As a result

, the Hungarian health system has deteriorated substantially, directly

effecting

arousing affect

affecting

the health of the local population.

This

demonstrates that by stealing

knowledgable

highly educated; having extensive information or understanding

knowledgeable

people, a deficit is formed, which have a negative effect on poorer countries. Another argument

estblishing

set up or found

establishing

the fact that migration of qualified workers is similar to

stealing

Russian leader who succeeded Lenin as head of the Communist Party and created a totalitarian state by purging all opposition (1879-1953)

Stalin

, is that many countries prefer to import professional workers rather than training people, because it is financially preferable. The overall cost of educating of a computer scientist,

for example

, is substantially higher

then

conjunction used in comparatives

than

the salary given to a foreign scientist.

Also

, the annual salary given to a foreign

surgent

Suggestion

Surgent

segment

is much less than the cost of training one. These examples

demosnstrate

give an exhibition of to an interested audience

demonstrate

demonstrated

demonstrates

that for rich countries, is it financially lucrative to important foreign qualified workers, rather than to educate them. In conclusion, I believe that convincing people

to migrate

Suggestion

migrate

to richer countries for work purposes is similar to stealing because it prevents poor countries to use their human resources on one hand, and assist rich countries to become richer. We should aspire to have an

equall

having the same quantity, value, or measure as another

equal

society and assist each other.