More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. Do you agree or disagree?

When considering the movement of professional workers to rich countries, one should bear in mind the complexity of the issue. Some people believe
this
movement is part of the normal shifts happening in the international job market. Others, including myself, think that encouraging people with professional experience to work in developed countries in order to gain a higher salary is immoral and should be regulated. In the following essay, I will provide arguments and examples to support my opinion. Encouraging qualified
personal
Suggestion
persons
from underdeveloped and poor countries to move to richer areas, increase the
economical
Suggestion
economic
and financial differences, and prevents nations from developing their economy. When qualified personal like physicians, teachers and
engeneers
a person who uses scientific knowledge to solve practical problems
engineers
are encouraged to migrate to countries with better paying positions, a vacancy is formed which is unfortunately occupied by lesser
experiecne
the accumulation of knowledge or skill that results from direct participation in events or activities
experience
personal.
Consequently
, the quality of work is damaged,
further
widening the differences between the countries.
This
can be seen in
Hungary where
Accept comma addition
Hungary, where
many medical physicians were offered a position in
Germeny
a republic in central Europe; split into East Germany and West Germany after World War II and reunited in 1990
Germany
in the
last
10 years.
As a result
, the Hungarian health system has deteriorated substantially, directly
effecting
arousing affect
affecting
the health of the local population.
This
demonstrates that by stealing
knowledgable
highly educated; having extensive information or understanding
knowledgeable
people, a deficit is formed, which have a negative effect on poorer countries. Another argument
estblishing
set up or found
establishing
the fact that migration of qualified workers is similar to
stealing
Russian leader who succeeded Lenin as head of the Communist Party and created a totalitarian state by purging all opposition (1879-1953)
Stalin
, is that many countries prefer to import professional workers rather than training people, because it is financially preferable. The overall cost of educating of a computer scientist,
for example
, is substantially higher
then
conjunction used in comparatives
than
the salary given to a foreign scientist.
Also
, the annual salary given to a foreign
surgent
Suggestion
Surgent
segment
is much less than the cost of training one. These examples
demosnstrate
give an exhibition of to an interested audience
demonstrate
demonstrated
demonstrates
that for rich countries, is it financially lucrative to important foreign qualified workers, rather than to educate them. In conclusion, I believe that convincing people
to migrate
Suggestion
migrate
to richer countries for work purposes is similar to stealing because it prevents poor countries to use their human resources on one hand, and assist rich countries to become richer. We should aspire to have an
equall
having the same quantity, value, or measure as another
equal
society and assist each other.
Submitted by chilafp on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: