Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It has been observed that most of the wealthy nations provide financial support to the impoverished countries. But, unfortunately

this

does not help the underdeveloped nations to solve their problems. So I completely agree that, these nations require other sources of aid from developed countries to eradicate poverty from poor countries. To embark on,

although

the financial support resolves some of the problems

such

as public health issues by providing free health service during floods and droughts, but most of the other issues like literacy, GDP and economical growth remains unsolved.

For instance

, the united states of America provide financial aid to the poor nations like Iran and Syria during their difficult conditions but still they remain as underdeveloped countries. To turn on possible other aids,

firstly

, wealthy nations should invest some money in the economically deprived countries to build free educational services to increase the literacy rate, which in turn help in the economic growth by attaining good jobs by the people of the poor nations. Education is the key to resolve many of the problems in any part of the world.

Secondly

, most of the countries are remained poor because of improper laws and rules followed. So, developed countries should help these nations to build strong constitution and bring strict amendments in the law.

Furthermore

, rich countries should

also

provide free health services and establish hospitals with modern techniques. To conclude, only financial support from wealthy countries does not eradicate the poverty in

the poorer

Suggestion

the poorest

nations, they should

also

help them in others ways like bringing up literacy rate and providing free medical service.