The internet could revolutionize the world in the future, if everyone could have easy access to all information that is available on the world wide web. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

During the recent years, the technology has improved significantly all over the

world

and the

internet

has played a considerable role in our life. There is an idea about the revolution of the

world

with

internet

in the future, which it depends on simple

access

to all available data through the

world

wide web by everyone. I

however

disagree with the given statement on the basis of

information

copyright

.

To begin

with, the main reason is that all of the

information

through

internet

was written by someone and should be followed

copyright

. So, if all the data are available and reachable without any limitation or roles, nobody respect

copyright

and referencing.

For instance

,

access

to the researches and photos easily and using them simply, might be trampled the author’s right.

Hence

, the

access

to the

information

should be follow a standard role which determines the clear rights clearly. Having said that,

however

, another compelling argument against simple

access

to the

information

is personal

information

security.

That is

to say, the more technology is improving the more private hard drive is being abolished and online storage is replacing and for

this

purpose, restricted

access

is safer and logical than simple

access

to all data. As an example,

access

to the private

information

leads to abuse and loss of privacy which cannot be accepted by people.

Thus

, when the privacy policy of the

internet

is not acceptable by everyone it cannot alter the

world

dramatically. To sum up, I personally believe that it is ethically unacceptable that the

internet

can revolutionize the

world

with easy

access

to the

information

by everyone.

This

is mainly because of privacy policy and

copyright

.