In the past, lectures were used as a way of teaching large numbers of students, but now with the development of technology for education, many people think there is no justification for attending lectures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

#lectures #numbers #students #development #technology #education #people #justification

It has been argued that online teaching has rendered attending lectures obsolete. Many university students believe that lecturers are not essential and they can learn alone using resources available on the internet.

However

, I disagree with

this

assumption, and I think lectures are still an important way of learning because it can be interactive, save time and effort for students, and help them pass their examinations. Lectures allow students to interact with academics which are usually experts on their subjects.

Therefore

, students can engage in discussion and ask questions which facilitate their understanding.

Furthermore

, many universities have upgraded their lecturers to more active project-based ones. Students are expected to solve problems and communicate with their classmates.

For instance

, in my Master course, the lectures were engaging because the lecturer divided us into groups and ask us to solve problems, and present our solutions. Unfortunately, not all lectures are interactive, nor all lecturers are engaging.

In addition

, attending lectures can save time and effort because lecturers present the topic in a simplified manner which facilitate learning. Students who decide not attend the lecturers would need more time to read and absorb the materials.

Moreover

, they would miss important information mentioned in the class which are not in available in other reading sources.

This

may affect their performance in examinations. Studies have shown that students who do not miss their lectures are more likely to have better grades. To conclude, despite the advance in teaching technology and the availability of online courses, lectures are still an effective teaching tool in academia p

articularly

Suggestion

particular

modern interactive lectures.

Submitted by muna0879900 on Tue Jan 21 2020

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

Paragraph 1 - Introduction

Sentence 1 - Background statement
Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
Sentence 3 - Thesis
Sentence 4 - Outline sentence

Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph

Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
Sentence 2 - Example
Sentence 3 - Discussion
Sentence 4 - Conclusion

Paragraph 4 - Conclusion

Sentence 1 - Summary
Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Do you want to check your IELTS essays?

Submit unlimited essays, letters and charts. Sign up right now and start improving your writing skills.

7Linking words
meeting the goal of 7 or more
0Word repetition
meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Grammar mistakes
 

5 paragraphs

263 words

0123456789.0505

Overall Band Score

Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0

Logical structure

Introduction & conclusion present

Supported main points

Accurate linking words

Variety in linking words

Lexical resource: 8.0

Varied vocabulary

Accurate spelling & word formation

Grammatical Range: 8.0

Mix of complex & simple sentences

Clear and correct grammar

Task Achievement: 5.0

Complete response

Clear & comprehensive ideas

Relevant & specific examples

Appropriate word count

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 checks
Get all the feedback you need to keep improving your charts and letters.
Unlimited Task 2 checks
Practice and perfect your skills with essays.
Personalized suggestions
Know how to boost your score.
Detailed mistakes analysis
Get instant feedback. Spot every mistake.
Topic ideas generator
Get topic-specific ideas to enhance your writing.
Vocabulary helper
Get the right words for any topic.
Progress tracking
Track your writing improvements.

What to do next:

Look at other essays:

7.5
band
Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some think that adding more and more sports centres is the most beneficial way to improve the community's health, others believe that there are better ways to do this. Although increasing the number of gyms would motivate people to exercise more and become healthier, I firmly believe that educating them about health is far more effective.
7
band
Money spent on space exploration is a complete waste. Governments could better spend this money on other things to benefit the nation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Government spending on space programs is becoming more and more vast over the last decades. Some people believe such expenses are a total waste and must be allocated to other social and economic fields. It is disagreed that these investments are useless and do not provide advantages to the nation. This essay will shed some light on the issue and provide several examples to support the thesis.
7
band
In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
One of the widely discussed issues nowadays is the population in rural areas is declining. It is undeniable that moving from one area to another has become a usual thing in our society. However, there is no absolute agreement as some people find living in the cities beneficial, while others consider everything associated with moving to a big city negatively. Surely, there are both pros and cons to living and building your life in the metropolis, but I believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
4
band
Some people think that it's important to spend a lot of money on family celebration (e.g. weddings, birthdays). But some people say that expensive celebrations are a waste of money. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
In the past and nowadays many people spend a huge of money to celebrate a relaxing day. It is bring about working hard. By all means, every country has this type of people. Even though some people think that is a to give a thrill
5.5
band
Some people believe that the government should fund art and culture, while others think that is should only fund sciences. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The debate regarding government expenditure has often centered around whether it is more beneficial to finance the arts and culture sector or solely focus on the scientific disciplines. I firmly agree that government funding should prioritize art and culture, as they are fundamental to preserve national identity and stimulating economic growth.

In the past, lectures were used as a way of teaching large numbers of students, but now with the development of technology for education, many people think there is no justification for attending lectures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Fully explain your ideas

Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Money spent on space exploration is a complete waste. Governments could better spend this money on other things to benefit the nation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In many countries around the world, rural people are moving to cities, so the population in the countryside is decreasing. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Some people think that it's important to spend a lot of money on family celebration (e.g. weddings, birthdays). But some people say that expensive celebrations are a waste of money. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

Some people believe that the government should fund art and culture, while others think that is should only fund sciences. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.