The prevention of health problems and health illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this. To what extent do you agree.

It is an undeniable fact that the prevention of diseases is better than curing the same. A school of thought believes that the

government

should be funding to take precautionary measures. In my opinion, I strongly agree that there should be an appropriate funding to prevent health issues and illness in people.

Firstly

, the

government

should be releasing sufficient funds to maintain the cleanliness of the country. Because

this

approach will

end the outbreak of

Suggestion

end with the outbreak of

any infectious disease, which is caused by poor hygiene of a place.

For example

, a research conducted by the World Health Organisation demonstrated that 90% of the illness in a society is caused by the unhealthy environment.

As a result

of unhealthiness the public living in that area gets infected ad

this

will be spreading rapidly across the nation, which puts a pressure on the

government

.

Secondly

, the

government

should be spending more on medical researches.

In other words

, medical scientists will have better knowledge on how to prevent deadly diseases, which paves the way for a nation to save the lives of their own people and that country becomes the talk of the world.

For instance

, pasteurization of milk was invented by the US scientist, which not only saves many lives now but

also

crowned America with glory.

Consequently

,

this

invention is helping the entire globe to stay away from the diseases caused by the unpasteurised milk. In conclusion, I argue that the

government

funding should reflect the prevention of health issues and illness by maintaining cleanliness and by focusing more on researches to prevent any deadly diseases.