In some countries, criminal trials are shown on television for the public. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

It is increasingly common to broadcast criminal
court
proceedings on television for the wider public. While it might seem to have certain drawbacks, showing trials
also
does present certain benefits. In my opinion, the advantages of
this
far outweighs possible disadvantages.
To begin
with, it is claimed that showing
court
proceedings on the screen might impose bias to people who watch these proceedings. None of them are perfect, the argument goes, since the
court
can be corrupted or misled by the false prosecution.
Moreover
, it might be bolstered by the lack of knowledge in law which usually is present in people without specific knowledge.
For instance
, recent studies have shown a high rate of convicting innocent people, which afterwards have suffered from disdain of their neighbours.
Thus
, is it said, broadcasting
court
processes might create and bolster prejudice in its watchers towards those who could be innocent.
Conversely
, one of the greatest benefits of the
trials
a track or mark left by something that has passed
trails
shown on television is that they have become more open and clearer.
This
is because they are broadcast for a big number of people of different education, who can notice inaccuracies or even a bribed process, so trials are pushed to be maximally just and open. The
second
virtue is that, watching these processes, public is becoming deterred to committing crime and
also
it gives them an incentive to boost their knowledge regarding legal issues. To illustrate, there was a substantial decrease of juvenile delinquency in Russia after the trials have started to be shown. These reasons allow to infer that showing prosecutions
is
Suggestion
are
more advantageous, than not. To conclude, broadcasting of crime trials on television is evident, and,
although
, somebody might argue that it creates more drawbacks like increased bias in people, from my perspective, these are entirely outweighed by its benefits which include the clearer
court
proceedings, a strong deterrence to people and motivation to learn the law. By educating the wider public and improving the law sector through
such
practices, we can achieve a better society with the just
court
.
Submitted by egvein13 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • transparency
  • public oversight
  • judicial system
  • educational value
  • privacy concerns
  • re-traumatizing
  • juror behavior
  • fairness
  • public opinion
  • media sensationalism
  • impartiality
  • economic benefits
  • legal proceedings
  • misinterpretation
  • broadcasters
  • legal institutions
What to do next:
Look at other essays: