Government should spend money to encourage the development of sport and art for school students, rather than supporting professional sports and art performance for general public. Do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, in

this

contemporary world, sports and

arts

Suggestion

the arts

make the bondings

more stronger

Suggestion

stronger

among people of different countries than the previous time. But it is now still a controversial issue whether

government

Suggestion

the government

spend

Suggestion

spends

money

on the development of

sport

and

art

for

school

students or the opposite (professional

sport

or

art

performance for general people) in that case. Personally, I partially agree with the former statement. In my opinion, I strongly believe

government

expenditures must be

go

Suggestion

going

on for both novice and experienced performer. In

this

essay, I will discuss the issue with giving examples of two recent statistics data.

Firstly

, it is always necessary to

stronly

with strength or in a strong manner

strongly

make up the

pipe-line

gossip spread by spoken communication

pipeline

for the bright future of the performers who would willingly lead a nation. It is only possible when an expenditure of the

government

would go on for

school

students

as

Suggestion

at

that time is vital for learning

any thing

an indefinite thing

anything

smoothly.

Moreover

, young blood is always hungry for tanking any upcoming challenge easily.

For example

, Australian

government

spend

Suggestion

spends

a large amount of

money

(around 15%) from their budget to encourage the novice

art

and

sprort

an active diversion requiring physical exertion and competition

sport

performer in a

school

level.

However

, these performers

now holds

Suggestion

now hold

are now holding

have now held

for the vital places in a national Australian team. So, it is conclusively clear that a

well

Suggestion

good

amount of

money

must be spent to encourage the development of

art

and

sport

performer in a

school

level.

Secondly

, if the

goverment

the organization that is the governing authority of a political unit

government

not spend

Suggestion

doesn't spend

a handsome

money

for the professional

art

and

sport

performers

then

obviously they would not show their performances in a world class

tournaments

Suggestion

tournament

because of the crisis of the

money

.

Moreover

, it is quite impossible to arrange all the things with private or self fundings.

As a result

,

nation

Suggestion

the nation

nations

would miss the glory to attend or win the prizes of

such

type of tournaments.

For instance

,

combodian national olympic team

Suggestion

the Cambodian national Olympic team

combodian national Olympic team

Cambodian national Olympic team

Cambodian national olympic team

did not attend the

last

olympic

of or relating to the Olympic Games

Olympic

tournament as the

government

of

this

country did not take their responsibility for

national crisis

Suggestion

a national crisis

. As a consequence, they had missed the chance

for

Suggestion

of

winning the prizes. So, it is

also

the

responsibilty

the social force that binds you to the courses of action demanded by that force

responsibility

responsibilities

of the

government

to spend

money

for the experienced performers. In conclusion,

although

it is a

controvercial

marked by or capable of arousing controversy

controversial

issue whether

government

spend their income for a long time, it would obviously wise for the

government

to spend their

money

for

school

students as well as for general people to encourage the development of

sport

and

art

performers.