Public museums and art galleries are not needed because people can see historical objects and artistic works by using computers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, with the widespread of the Internet technology, people can visit the museums and galleries online website to see the historical collections.
However
, whether
this
sort of art appreciation would one day replace the real ones remains a controversial issue. I agree with the view that regardless of the convenience of online collections, the traditional expositions are still indispensable.
Firstly
, it is obvious that only concrete museums can provide a both holistic and detailed view of varied items in front of visitors.
This
is because no matter how real and vivid computer images are, they are only digital signals that are in
form
Suggestion
the form
of pictures, videos or texts, not the works that we see with our own eyes and even touch with our own fingertips.
Therefore
, museums and galleries are the main places of various kinds of collections.
Moreover
, scientific research
also
primarily relies on the real objects rather than the Internet images.
For example
, with careful inspection of paper texture, the real size of pictures,
etc
continuing in the same way
etc.
, scientists are capable to dig the hidden information from the famous portrait painting, Mona Lisa. Frankly, the job
can not
can not
cannot
be done via the
second
-hand images in the computer.
That is
not to say that the online museums are useless. For many people who are keen on historical objects and artistic
works but
Accept comma addition
works, but
live far away from them, they only have the chances to see them by the modern technology. But to be honest,
this
will not impress them as
greatly
Suggestion
great
as the real things. In sum, virtual
images will
Accept comma addition
images, will
never be able to take the position of the real public museums and art galleries; meanwhile, we have to admit the fact that the online collections indeed can help some particular people in some particular circumstances. We should not only fully harness the dissemination power of
Internet
Suggestion
the Internet
, but attract visitors into the concrete museums.
Submitted by alberthoo.math on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: