Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is often believed by some institutions that their personnel dressing should be tidy while a few hold to a high esteem their

staff

performance in delivering set objectives. In my opinion, both views are valid. As smart dressing portrays a good

image

of the company, quality of

work

done by the

staff

speaks to the

organisations

capacity and capability in achieving their goals.

Firstly

, a

staff

is the mirror

image

of the organisation he/she works for.

This

image

is reflected in the

staff

outward appearance to the outside world. An appearance that should be neat and formal, command respect for the

staff

and by extension the organisation. In fact, some companies like the bank have dress codes for every cadre of

work force

Suggestion

the work force

.

Secondly

, a number of

organisations

, at the beginning of the year set objectives for their

staff

and either semi-annually or annually appraise their achievement.

This

is used to measure the workers capability and competence in achieving the set goals which form part of the

organisations

Suggestion

organisation's

goal.

For instance

, I

work

with an

organisations

Suggestion

organisation

that is

funded by Centre for Disease Control (CDC). The funders give us target for different indicators that speaks to the program my institution is implementing. I set my target with my direct supervisor based on my agreed job description and later evaluated based on my performance in achieving those set goals. When I meet my set targets, I in turn achieve the

organisations

Suggestion

organisation's

goal which gives them a good

image

to the funders and the outside world. In conclusion, smart dressing and personnel performance both

work

in tandem to give the

staff

high value in the employment market and position the organisation in the competitive market.