Evaluate the usefulness of Bigelow and La Gaipa’s (1975) work for understanding children’s friendship.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Bigelow and La Gaipa’s
study
Use synonyms
into the understanding of friendships was the pioneering
study
Use synonyms
into childhood
friendship
Use synonyms
, as at the time very little research had been done at the time. Their experiment was designed to help understand the influxes that
friendship
Use synonyms
could have on the impact during their development. The
method
Use synonyms
that they used to perform their
study
Use synonyms
was to ask the participant to write an
essay
Use synonyms
on what they expected from their best
friend
Use synonyms
. The participant where a
sample
Use synonyms
of 480 children aged from six and fourteen chosen from 8 different
school
Suggestion
schools
with a mix of thirty boys and thirty girls.
This
Linking Words
sample
Use synonyms
size ranges from upper-working-class and lower-middle-class.
This
Linking Words
included a large
sample
Use synonyms
size to offer a wider range of results.
This
Linking Words
method
Use synonyms
of
study
Use synonyms
allowed them to collect written form of data which could
then
Linking Words
be analysed and coded. Allowing them to compare them to the characteristics of a best
friend
Use synonyms
that they had made for
this
Linking Words
study
Use synonyms
. Body – 600 It should be noted that
this
Linking Words
research was taken place during a time where very little importance was taken on the understanding of children
friendship
Use synonyms
.
This
Linking Words
experiment was designed in a way that allowed to track the development of
friendship
Use synonyms
as children grew older.
This
Linking Words
was done by using a wide age group. Here we can take a look at how useful the result of these tests are and why they have some limitations. Due to the
Use synonyms
essay
an appraisal of the state of affairs
assay
method
Use synonyms
they used during
this
Linking Words
research it allowed for some clear limitations for the younger group when it came to write about their best
friend
Use synonyms
.
For example
Linking Words
, the vocabulary of a six year old will limit the way they express how they feel about their best
friend
Use synonyms
as opposed to a fourteen year old with a
wider
Suggestion
wide
vocabulary. Whilst
this
Linking Words
does show some of the limitations of
this
Linking Words
method
Use synonyms
of
experiment it
Accept comma addition
experiment, it
also
Linking Words
shows how
friendship
Use synonyms
develops and understanding of
friendship
Use synonyms
as children age. Another limitation found in
this
Linking Words
study
Use synonyms
was the coding
method
Use synonyms
chosen by Bigelow and La Gaipa. As the
essay
Use synonyms
where qualitative data they converted
this
Linking Words
data into quantitative using a pre-written
list of before the
Suggestion
list before the
study
Use synonyms
took place. By converting the
essay
Use synonyms
, it lost what could be
consider
Suggestion
considered
important information as if the personal dimension did not fit into expectations
this
Linking Words
result was
simple
Suggestion
simply
lost and was not considered.
This
Linking Words
is often a
draw back
the quality of being a hindrance
drawback
when it comes to converting qualitative to quantitative data as you are often looking for key words and qualities listed and might miss out on the small details of
friendship
Use synonyms
that a child might class as important. With the limitations being
said there
Accept comma addition
said, there
are many benefits
to
Suggestion
of
the
method
Use synonyms
chosen for
this
Linking Words
study
Use synonyms
. Bigelow and La Gaipa wanted to include a large
sample
Use synonyms
size for their
study
Use synonyms
and to make
this
Linking Words
realistic they had

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: