Some pp believe that public buildings should be moved out ò the city to promote citizen's well being and better economic growing, while some argue that the planning will cause more harm than good. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There was a plan that public buildings should be moved out of the

city

. It can lead to two main benefits including both providing citizen's health and supporting more for economic growth.

While

some argue that planning will cause more harm than good, I stand in the opposite mind. From my point of view, that plan has more advantages than disadvantages. To see more props of moving public-sector buildings of society, I will show you the harm of not moving public buildings to the suburbs. When a developed

city

will attempt a significant workforce. Leading to the excessive load of population density pressure.

Although

a

city

contains high inhabitants, a limited land area is more likely to cause

traffic

jams. And you know that transport is the lifeblood of the economy.

According to

an examination from JICA (Japan International

Cooporation

Correct your spelling

Cooperation

Corporation

Agency), Manila's

traffic

jams cost 57 million dollars per day, and some 80 to 95

percent

Change the spelling

per cent

show examples

of air pollution in Metro Manila comes from vehicles. Through that, we see the serious consequences of not developing urban areas in a sustainable manner. I don't deny that expanding a

city

by moving public towers to the outskirts is

also

better in reducing

traffic

jams. But it

also

means the distance and time you spend commuting from home to work office increases. It takes time to travel and doesn't save much material compared to being stuck in

traffic

in the inner

city

. By the way, riding under the weather is something sixty - forty. Sixty is suddenly raining or hot temperature and forty is nice weather. So, if we put the office towers far from the inner

city

, it will affect productivity. And yes, it may result in low economic development. Every coin has two sides. There nothing comes without props or cons. But as for

this

plan with the ultimate goal of rectifying the problems in question, I choose a sustainable way with targeted steps

as well as

careful calculations. I know economic growth is important to make our lives better but the environment and our health are unlimited it is something money cannot buy, and we easily forget to protect it. So, remember to maintain health

while

making money, and protect the environment

while

developing the economy!