It is considered by most individuals that government should provide free of cost commuting facilities to the ordinary people in the metropolitan cities.
Although
the administration of the country will have to face certain problems pertaining to the maintenance of vehicles, it would encourage the use of public services among the citizens of the nation.
Linking Words
To begin
with, if the administration does not charge masses for using public amenities, Linking Words
such
as buses and trains, a large part of the population will get motivated to take advantage of these modes of travel.Linking Words
Furthermore
, traffic jams and gridlocks on roads would reduce to a substantial extent.Linking Words
For instance
, in the capital city of my country India, Delhi, a major part of the population commute to their workstations by private vehicles, which has enhanced the congestion on the roads. By implementation of Linking Words
this
rule current situation can be tackled to a vast level.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, Linking Words
this
situation would be quite cumbersome for the authorities.Since due to lack of funds our administration will not be able to improve these facilities, they do not find themselves capable of improving and modifying travelling means. Linking Words
This
is because the central power relies completely on the public funds for any improvement.Linking Words
For instance
, most of the rent, Linking Words
that is
collected from selling the tickets, is used in modification and amendment of transport modes, but free accessibility to the use of these services means no income for the government. In short, transportation department suffers from huge loss in the deficiency of money.
To conclude, there is some segment of the population Linking Words
that is
in favour of accessing free means of travel.Despite having their agreement in order to promote Linking Words
such
modes, the demerits of losses to the governing bodies cannot be denied.Linking Words