In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

It is considered by some that the
government
need to spend a lot of
money
to build a very fast train between cities, but there are others who believe that existing public
transport
improvement is more important. In my opinion, both improving public
transportation
and constructing new railway line are necessary, so the amount of
money
spent has to be balanced with one another. On the one hand, the
government
must build some kind of access to increase the profit for bad
economy
cities.
In other words
, the
government
does not have any other choices and have to invest a large sum of
money
to grow the
economy
of low profit cities. Take
for example
, Yogyakarta which has now become one of the most popular city in central Java due to the new constructed railway lines from Jakarta, the capital city of Indonesia.
As a result
, Yogyakarta
economy
rises dramatically because people start going there with multiple purposes, including travelling, studying, job hunting, etc.
Thus
, building a new infrastructure,
such
as a new railway line for very fast trains between cities, would make a significant effect to the economic growth.
On the other hand
, some
money
need to be poured for improving and maintaining public
transport
facilities. If the public
transportation
was not convenient and comfortable to use, many people would start to avoid using the
transportation
.
Consequently
, the projects will be considered as a failure and a waste of
money
. That's why other than developing a new infrastructure, the
government
need to always keep a close look at the existing public
transportation
. In conclusion, both improving public
transport
and building a new infrastructure were important because
this
would lead into a better
economy
and ensuring the existing public
transport
not to be wasted.
Submitted by tryalditama on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: