In future, it seems to be difficult to live on the Earth. More money should be spend on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Our
planet
is increasingly turning out to be a threatened place to live in,
hence
it is suggested by a few that the projects like finding new planets to colonise, should be funded more comprehensively. I disagree with
this
narrative. It is accepted that our world is presently, facing many problems.
For example
, scarcity of the safe drinking water and the hiking, environmental pollutants at an alarming rate are posing a serious threat to the human existence.
Therefore
, keeping these growing threats in view, it perhaps seems logical that more capital should be spent to increase the efforts to find a new liveable place for the human beings.
However
, a huge resources have already been wasted in the futile efforts to find a new
such
planet
that can support the human race and other living beings. Even after that, there is not a single clue available for the existence of
this
kind of earth as yet, and
further
spending money in
this
direction seems a sheer waste of the valuable resources. These limited finances should rather be diverted to solve the existing issues of our own earth. One
such
example is the investments in the reusable energy. It will preserve the remaining reserves of these energy resources that will perhaps solve some of the issues for which some people are looking for the new places to live on. Since the after-burn effects of renewable fuels are less toxic, industrial and vehicle exhausts will,
therefore
, prevent the environmental pollution at the same time. Even if it is thought that scientists succeed in finding
such
planet
, the cost of shifting humans to that asteroid would be perhaps impossible because of the expenditure and the efforts involved. In conclusion, I consider that there is no need to waste finances on the useless efforts like finding a new liveable world for humans. These valuable resources should rather be consumed in dealing those problems that our earth is facing today. The governments should continue funding the space research projects, but
this
should not be at the cost of neglecting or stop spending on the available solutions to make our
planet
a better place to live in.
Submitted by yasirjaved2219 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: