Some people think that art is an essential subject at school while others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Each subject has a specific reason why it is being taught

to begin

with. While it's believed by some people that

art

is a necessary thing for children to be studied at school, others think it's a useless and a time-consuming activity. The Essay will argue why Some people think that

art

is an essential subject at school, but why others think it is a waste of time. In fact, learning artistic activities,

such

as drawing and poetry can enrich the soul of a child.

Moreover

, it will make us see the beauty in everything around us because beauty lies in the eyes of a beholder.

For instance

, in Italy, a child once drew a picture of his mum dying in her bed,

however

, he expressed how pretty her features were to him even when she was in agony.

Therefore

,

art

not only changes the way we look at things, but

also

the way we feel towards them.

On the contrary

, it's claimed by some individuals that learning more about

such

spiritual subjects may not be as important as teaching children materialistic ones.

Furthermore

, they claim that

this

will only waste their valuable time.

For example

, in Japan, teachers no longer care about explaining the differences between poetry and improvisation,

instead

, they care about explaining the theory of relativity

becaus

for the reason that; on account of

because

they think it's more significant. It is for these reasons, it's thought that encouraging students to spend hours everyday painting or writing a poem is preposterous. In conclusion, it's a matter of taste whether we would like education to include

art

or not. The Essay argued why it's a controversial topic whether including

art

in curriculum is really essential or it's just a stupid decision. In my opinion, drawing, poetry and other artistic subjects are not only interesting, but

also

extremely beneficial.