Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?

It is undeniable that scientific investigation is imperative for a country’s development in
this
modern world.
However
, it is equally important to have a control in place as to who can carry out
such
exploration. To a larger extent, I agree that the ministry should have an upper hand when it comes to undertaking scientific analysis as they tend to be more people driven. There are various reasons why it is pivotal to have a ministry-run research projects.
To begin
with, when an investigation is carried out by the union, the motive behind is always people-driven and not money oriented.
As a result
, there is more transparency in the process and the need to invest in a quality exploration that benefits the general public
also
increases.
Furthermore
, a power is borne to be more responsible and has complete accountability when it comes to investing public money in
such
inquiry.
In contrast
, private organizations are not people oriented and they tend to invest in research projects that are more profitable.
In addition
, when the funding comes from the same organization, the results could
also
be biased to ensure there is a favourable outcome to the funding institution.
For example
, companies that produce medicinal drugs are legally obliged to go through rigorous trials, which may take several years to complete. As private companies invest a lump sum of money in
such
studies, it is impractical for them to wait for a longer tenure to attain the expected results.
Hence
, there is a higher probability of the quality being compromised to make the investigation successfully. In conclusion, carrying out and controlling scientific probe is a contentious issue as transparency and openness are pivotal for a quality research. Undoubtedly,
this
is only possible if done by a non-profit organization like the authority.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • scientific research
  • carried out
  • controlled
  • governments
  • private companies
  • unbiased
  • prioritize
  • profit
  • public interest
  • allocate resources
  • lucrative
  • collaboration
  • information sharing
  • confidential
  • competitive advantage
What to do next:
Look at other essays: