Some people say that Government should break down all the historic building and replace them with modern buildings. Do you agree or disagree?

Historic structures reflect the brilliant work done by our ancestral generations. It's an evidence of their existence and immense human architectural capacity. In the recent times, there have been debates around

this

where some people mention that the Government should collapse all the ancestral buildings and replace them with a modern

city

plan.

This

essay will discuss why the classic creations should be kept intact with the other modern buildings around the

city

and native towns. Though the beauty of the old creations is pleasing to the eye, some experts believe that getting these mansions down would help the

city

immensely.

This

is because, it disturbs the modern plan crafted for the towns.

For example

, if Delhi's historic places were rebuilt with a new

city

plan that would reduce the horrendous traffic in the place.

Also

, as there is a cost involved in the maintenance of these wonder towers, it is best to bulldoze these away. The maintenance of these wonders of the country would cost a bomb to maintain them with staff salaries, human personnel management, cleaning, etc. Though some people agree that keeping these structures would be helpful, the advantages of reserving these outweigh the argument. Age old buildings bring great richness to the places it was built. Many individuals protest against bringing

such

heritage down. Reason being that they add to the beauty of the

city

. I.e. There are many tourists seem to only be mesmerized by the world heritages built across the

city

. One

such

example is about people coming all over from different places of India to see the tall buildings of Mumbai’s Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus Railway station, which is a UNESCO World Heritage site as compared to viewing the landscape of modern art that isn’t very appealing to everybody.

Also

, the brilliance in adoring our forefather’s creative skills is satisfying for the public to experience for generations ahead. Another example is that of the southern state temples in India, where each carving defines the artistic abilities of our creators.

This

is unbeatable in comparison to constructing contemporary buildings. As these monuments won’t be recreated again in the history of mankind, it is prudent to preserve them. To conclude, ancient infrastructure should be protected and maintained for the betterment of the future generations to learn and appreciate the elements of the glory that our ancestors left behind as a gift for us.

This

makes it clear that I strongly disagree to let government crash all the historic buildings to revamp it by constructing new generation towers.