In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

There has been a difference of opinion regarding the merits of setting a limit on highest wages, I would argue that governments should make efforts in order to regulate salaries. It is understandable why the regulation of employee remuneration could be seen as beneficial.

To begin

with, it is reasonable that workers may be able to receive earnings as much as companies are willing to pay. In

this

way, higher salaries can attract the most talented workers in their fields.

For example

, the great companies in technology as Google, are able to employ top-programmers because they are willing to pay high incomes.

Furthermore

, money can be a great motivating-tool. Employees that are highly motivated will result in a thriving economy and

therefore

in higher

taxes

Suggestion

tax

revenue, and

this

will benefit to everyone. Despite the arguments mentioned above, I agree with those who believe that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.

Firstly

, if the amount of money earned

were reduced

Suggestion

was reduced

, we might have a greater equal situation for most workers. Indeed, the pay-gap between bosses and employees could be reduced in order to avoid the

constantly

Suggestion

constant

feeling of

unfair

Suggestion

unfairness

, which is experienced by workers.

Secondly

, if we took measures to regulate earnings, it would be feasible to increase the higher minimum wage. One possible consequence of

this

might be the fall in crime rates and poverty, because, the general population will experience an improved standard of living. By way of conclusion, it seems to me that governments should set a limit on wages of the highest earners of society.