It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that it is very crucial for young kids to know about the local happenings.

However

, other people give importance to global

history

as it is considered more useful. Each and every

place

have their own unique

history

. In my opinion, I agree with the statement that local

history

should be taught to school

chilnd

a young person of either sex

child

can be lost over the period of time, to prevent

such

miss happenings it is necessary to encourage children to seek knowledge of the

place

.

For example

, some of the tribes lost their

history

and the origin, and know they don’t

hadren

become hard or harder

harden

. I will propose possible illustration for the same.

To begin

with, every

place

has its own series of events, and to preserve it, children should learn the

history

of the

place

.

History

can be altered

ave

Suggestion

Ave

over

of

a promising tale to tell. In all,

History

keeps the authenticity of the

place

intact.

Secondly

, it necessitates emotional attachment to the land,

this

often help children to grow stronger.

In other words

, it entails a sense of patriotism for the

place

and binds the soul with the soil.

For instance

, People tend to die to protect their unique culture and heritage. They have pride in their

history

, and they want to pass theses values to their children. To conclude,

history

is more than a factual representation of the occurrence of events, it is connected emotionally to peoples lives.

Therefore

, it is essential for children to know about

such

events which changed their ancestor’s lives. It is the responsibility of the parent and the government to fetch these happening in children’s school books.