Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money protecting animals and their habitat. This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in the society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree?

Recently, a significant amount of expenditure was allocated to protecting animals and their habitat by both authorities and people. Several argue it should be spent on essential problems in the community,

such

Linking Words

as poverty and health care. I completely agree with

this

Linking Words

view since protecting society from impoverishment can prevent them from hurting creatures, and providing better medical therapy enhances the way they treat other living beings.

To begin

Linking Words

with, saving humanity from destitution can deter individuals from destroying wildlife.

In other words

Linking Words

, when in a desperate condition, a part of them may do everything to get money, including illegal activities regarding animals, particularly trading them for their benefit.

For example

Linking Words

, with the growing demand for predators

such

Linking Words

as lions and tigers among affluent societies, people hunt and breed them in designed environments to sell at high prices.

As a result

Linking Words

, a recent economic study estimated that the value of transactions resulting from

this

Linking Words

practice has reached more than 1 billion dollars every year.

However

Linking Words

, unfortunately, a plethora of them become merely servants as a symbol of social status, and

it is clear that

Linking Words

this

Linking Words

practice damages their natural position.

In addition

Linking Words

, if the government can enhance medical facilities with more funding, society may treat creatures better.

This

Linking Words

is

due to

Linking Words

the fact that a great number of them suffer from diseases and face the high cost of pharmaceutical therapy, and these conditions can make them find it difficult to treat others, including their pets,

whereas

Linking Words

the opponent will likely have the time and budget to provide a good environment and treatment for theirs.

For instance

Linking Words

, a recent study discovered that in a country with 100% health coverage, the majority of the citizens give their pets insurance, indicating that they provide for the same basic needs as they do for themselves. In conclusion,

while

Linking Words

there was a vast amount of budget accounted for protecting animals from authorities and communities, I believe

this

Linking Words

asset should be focused on fundamental issues, especially medical care and impoverished conditions. For one thing, subsidizing the former may make it more accessible for individuals;

consequently

Linking Words

, they can allocate more cash to their pets. For another, resolving the latter can prevent unlawful behaviour that can damage wildlife, resulting in better treatment for them.