Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.

One of the highly controversial issues relates to fixed punishment which certain extent people support adequate and same beating regardless of the scandal and factors.

Although

the rest of people emphasize the roles of several factors

such

as motivation, condition as the reason of misdeed should be investigated and reflected verdict. In

this

essay sheds light on both webs arguments and conclude. Above all, some judiciary system manages people’s wrongdoing through fixed abuse. They make claims that

this

method outweigh its disadvantages.

Initially

, fixed punishment indicates exemplary penalties and in the result, society incline to avoid breaking rules or doing heinous crime.

Secondly

, it is

a

Suggestion

an

undeniable fact crime and any violent action is estimated negative events by society regardless of motivation and condition of offending.

Additionally

, pre-determined discipline may aid judiciary organization as deterring legislative step. It is considered that kind of system is able to dwindle crime rate and intensity of punishment. More likely in some occasions person might reflect and involves to offend lawlessness. It is an essential responsibility of advocates to take considering whether a person did it deliberately or accidentally, in other word in order to protect himself/ herself.

This

could be justice if we differ offender who killed someone deliberately,

for example

to rub or burger people or killed somebody accidentally when he or she was under attack. The

second

group of people thinks about fixed beating may deteriorate our society. Due to swift and quick verdict may cause unfair penal decision. Overall variations among criminals and offenders should be investigated and it may help the judiciary process too. Regarding me there is a subtle moment between two options. I guess we could not give a “zero unfair verdict”.

Hence

we have to be better off make balance and find an intermediary position without any biased.

Moreover government

Accept comma addition

Moreover, government

should strong education and other relates an area to decline lawlessness’s rate. In conclusion, two points of view have own and sound merits. The legislative system ought to highlight and use both of them split by conditions and occasions.