Having more money and less free time is better that earning less money and more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

This

is widely said that wealthy people have good quality of

life but

Accept comma addition

life, but

less

time

to spare as compared to people with less salary who have more spare occasion. I am of the opinion that people with less capital are more contend and happier than the latter

one

. On the

one

hand, it is obvious that rich people have all the resources to fulfil their lives with happiness and luxury.

Also

, it is evident that these people are working day and night to earn the money to have a quality

life

.

However

, while working all day long they are left with no

time

to spend with their families and relatives, which eventually eradicate their personal lives.

Moreover

, their children feel so lonely and isolated from both their parents are busy up to the neck.

Hence

, in my opinion, having monetary benefits are important, but not as much as the personal

life

and health.

On the other hand

, it is said that it is hard for people earning less

money to sustain in

Suggestion

money to sustain

the society and spend a lavish lifestyle,

however they

Accept comma addition

however, they

have a lot of

time

to spend with their families, think about expanding their business or career and

also

take a good care of their health. As it is rightly said, health is wealth,

this

can be true only when

one

has free

time

to spend on themselves.

Therefore

, I am supporting

this

notion that people with less payment have a peaceful

life

with more

time

to spend outside working. In conclusion, people should maintain a balance

life

between financial stability and personal

time

.

Also

,

one

should not comprise their quality of

life

with the monetary benefits because spending

time

with loved ones gives an immense pleasure which money can never provide.