For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the age and day, we are living in the world where children education is heated topic and often discussed. It is commonly argued that parents have less impact than teachers on children's intelligence and social growth. I strongly disagree

this

point because students could be perceived affect equally by parents and teacher which depended on different aspects. On encourage mental agility, I reckon that the teacher plays a vital role. In fact, not all of the teachers have enable to inspire in their students,

however they

Accept comma addition

however, they

are trained to improve intelligence on them in skillfull way.

For example

, most children are taught how to count in Maths which created fundamental knowledge. As the result, children's agility was perfected.

On the other hand

, from the perspective of enhancing social activities, parents have major responsibility because of several reasons.

First

of all, as

parents could

Accept comma addition

parents, could

spend more time on guiding their child than teachers, they had to gain more opportunities to monitor children on daily habits during weekends and holiday.

Moreover

, children could be provided model behaves in a range of situations in daily life. It could be in public places,

for instance

, in a well-known restaurant, children could enhance their horizons through communication skill with the staff, interactive way to each others or eating skill at a crowded party. It is an essential skill which brings positive effects on children social development. In conclusion, for school children, while teachers play a major role in mental agility, growth, parents have

adverse influence

Suggestion

an adverse influence

in improving social activities.