Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people
are of
Verb problem
apply
the
claim that increasing the minimum legal Correct article usage
apply
age
for drivers is the best way to improve road
safety
. Although
I understand the logic behind this
statement, I still finally
disagree with this
idea for some reasons which will be discussed below.
To begin
with, those individuals who believe that the minimum legal age
of drivers should be decreased may point out that youngsters are likely to be careless while
driving. This
is because they may not have enough experience in how to drive safely. To be more specific, young people do not participate in driving vehicles long enough so it leads to a lack of experience in driving, In addition
, young citizens are likely to cause accidents
because of lacking knowledge about traffic
laws. This
means that youngsters do not have enough time to be educated about traffic
regulations so they tend to ignore laws as well as
causing accidents
. Therefore
, if a driver was educated enough about traffic
, road
safety
would be fostered. For these reasons, the standard of drivers’s age
should be decreased in order to improve road
safety
.
Nevertheless
, although
I understand the benefits behind this
idea, I firmly believe that improving traffic
infrastructures is a solution that has more advantages than the above way. Firstly
, governments should invest in public transportation to foster road
safety
. This
is because the main reason for decreased road
safety
is traffic
congestion. To be more specific, the traffic
jams may cause a lack of space on roads
. As a consequence
, there are more accidents
as well as
decreasing the safety
of roads
. Therefore
, public transportation should be given priority by the governments to improve road
safety
. In addition
, similarly
to public vehicles, traffic
systems such
as traffic
lights, and traffic
signs should be advanced or adjusted to be more effective. One reason for this
idea is that they play a vital role in controlling vehicles effectively to reduce accidents
on roads
as well as
ensure the roads
are safe enough. Thus
, traffic
systems should be enhanced in order to improve road
safety
.
In conclusion, it is understandable why some people may argue that decreasing the minimum legal age
of drivers is crucial for raising road
safety
. However
, I cannot support such
a view given the aforementioned reasons and traffic
infrastructure is a better option.Submitted by [email protected] on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that your main points are clearly stated in the topic sentences of each paragraph to enhance coherence and understanding.
task achievement
Make sure you are consistently clear and precise in your ideas to make your arguments more compelling.
task achievement
Try to include more specific and relevant examples to support your arguments for a stronger case.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a clear structure with an introduction and conclusion, which aids in navigating the argument.
task achievement
You provided a clear stance on the topic, differentiating between the benefits of raising the minimum legal age for drivers and improving traffic infrastructure.
Word Count
IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.
A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.
Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.