Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion.

Being financially stable and having minimal

leisure

time

is better than being on low finance and having more

leisure

time

. In my opinion, I prefer having a low amount of

income

with more

leisure

time

.

This

essay will discuss both the sides of coin in detail. Let's take having sufficient

income

and minimal

leisure

time

into consideration. Excessive

income

comes with greater responsibilities and vice-a-versa. They work so hard to earn more and more money, which causes stress and leads to poor health. Having less free

time

can

also

be missing out on opportunities

such

as hobbies, family

time

and so on.

For example

, about 70% of people spend their life in earning more wages and tend to forget to live lively-hood.

Hence

, Earning

income

is essential, but it should be balanced with

leisure

time

.

On the other hand

, Earning sufficient wages and spending more

time

results in good health. A person with a

leisure

time

can involve himself with spending

time

with families, following their desired hobbies and developing a new skill set which will result in healthy living and creating memories.

For instance

, research from Harvard University stated that a person who spend their

time

on hobbies have higher life expectancy than those who work around the clock. To illustrate,

Leisure

time

should be the priority and should live the life rather than taking the stress of earning more money. To sum up, with greater money comes with more responsibilities and less of free

time

which can result in bad health.

However

, I believe getting some

time

for yourself should be above on the list as compared to earning

income

which results in healthy living.