Both governments and individuals are spending vast amount of money protecting animals and their habitats. This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in sociely such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree?

By spending a vast amount of funds in order to take

care

of wildlife, nations and citizens have forgotten to cope with essential problems like poverty and

health

care

.

Firstly

, the

first

cause of death in the world is due to starving. For

few years

Suggestion

a few years

, we have seen the number of associations that tackle starving have soared. Even with the assistance of those organizations, starving stays a big fight for a great number of countries mainly localized in Africa. One of the solutions, to cease or at least to reduce consequences is to develop methods to spare fruits and vegetables. A way could be to subsidize farmers, by helping them to purchase fertilizers in order to overproduce.

Secondly

, a large number of deaths could be avoided. If all lands had had an efficient and a free

health

care

system, many people wouldn’t have died. Unfortunately,

this

statement has touched developed and under-developed countries.

For example

, in

United States

Suggestion

the United States

, which is the richest country in the world, there is not a

health

care

for all, so, millions of Americans cannot afford a private insurance.

In addition

, the price of hospitalization is high.

As a result

, a lot of Americans prefer to stay at home with their illness to be cured. To conclude, I really believe human being should be central. By cutting out Starving and providing

health

care

for all is the key to live in a better shape and longer.

Nevertheless

, I do believe a human being could protect beast, but, reducing inequality to the access of the foods and

health

care

must be our priority

.

Accept space

.