Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Spending time and money on protection of

wildlife

Use synonyms

is more important than spending on human population. From past few decades the human population has grown enormously. In fact, which held to lose of environ and

wildlife

Use synonyms

as well. As humans count is growing, the count of

wildlife

Use synonyms

creatures is slowly eradicating. In my opinion, taking care of

wildlife

Use synonyms

and spending some money for them is absolutely right and there is no harm in it. Because, we have a humans have done lots of damage to the

nature

Use synonyms

. In the past, we used to experience many different types of rare

species

Use synonyms

, but know their hardly few

species

Use synonyms

which we can count on our finger tips. We cannot go against the

nature

Use synonyms

, because we are dependent on

nature

Use synonyms

but

nature

Use synonyms

is not. Though, we have a big forest for

wildlife

Use synonyms

, we are losing rare

species

Use synonyms

which cannot be publicly seen. So, developing zoo and spending some money for protection of

wildlife

Use synonyms

helps

further

Linking Words

generation kids to see those animals. As, we are 90s kids, still we miss lots of wild animals in the zoo.

For example

Linking Words

, blank panther, jaguar these are very rare

species

Use synonyms

and eye feast for many humans.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, pandas are very friendly in

Use synonyms

nature they

Accept comma addition

nature, they

have actually originated from China, but we can see very few in different countries. By taking some measures and actions we have to save our

wildlife

Use synonyms

.