Due to the development of the internet, public libraries are no longer necessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It has been argued that because the progress of the

internet

has revolutionized, public libraries are not required anymore.

This

essay entirely agrees with

this

statement because authentic websites are sharing

knowledge

over the

internet

and they are more flexible and

easy

Suggestion

easier

more easy

to access than libraries. The giant search engines,

such

as Google and Yahoo, are providing every bit of

knowledge

, a person can gain through the books in a library. Despite some forged

information

posted on certain

unauthenticated

established as genuine

authenticated

websites, the whole database of search engines is full of valuable

information

.

For example

, according to a survey of BBC, India, 65% of Indian citizens, who were used to go libraries to read or study journals, are using websites or an application on their smartphones.

Therefore

, it is not mandatory to keep public libraries functional. Another major reason is that

internet

-based

knowledge

is

flexible

Suggestion

flexibly

and

also

available with a host of examples.

This

is to say that the

information

that is

available in libraries is static, a student cannot seed for other methods to solve a problem rather than

that is

given in the books.

For instance

, since 2015, the ratio of students, who’re used to visit public libraries to study, has reduced by 15% because they feel the

internet

is giving them quick results and multiple methods.

As a result

, the requirement of public libraries is limited. To conclude, the revolution of the

internet

has changed the methods of gaining

knowledge

and has limited the scope of public libraries. Not only it reaches each part of the earth, but it

also

contains real and authentic

information

.