Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

With substantial development of science, technology, computer and steadily replace familiar objects and even realistic material gives way to e-books. But I don’t agree with maintaining public librarie

s is a waste of

Accept comma addition

with, maintaining

money.

This

essay is going to support a comprehensive recognition by reasonable points at issue and functional instances. The dawn of industrialization era opens a fresh prospect that automation gradually replace citizens at numerous dangerous sectors.

For example

, the robot is used medicine field, they support doctor carry out surgeries with highest accuracy.

Furthermore

, bulky items give way to neat objects, among them, there is books and public libraries. Only have a laptop computer, Residents can use e-books and online libraries anywhere and anytime.

Consequently

, dwellers can search, access information without books or libraries.

However

, maintaining public libraries is particularly significant and necessary. I attribute maintain to 2 excuses.

Firstly

, public feature of libraries is essential for sustaining relationships in residential areas. Citizens can more confident, promote “human f

actor” on them

Suggestion

more confidently

selves, especially children who are discovering the world.

Secondly

, there are no everyone has enough money in order to own a laptop or a smartphone.

For instance

, public libraries are an ideal place where citizens can encounter and take a conservation with each other,

this

results solidarity and ensure old relationships . Only in

this

way could conti

nue

Accept space

.

public feature of the society. In conclusion, science and technology are the inevitable and we take advantage of it. As long as it is appropriate with real circumstances and can protect traditional values.