Government should spend money on medical research and less on researching the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Instead
of directing money on the environment, the researches in medical
field
should be allocated
far
appropriate to; intended for
for
more funds by the state. I totally agree with
this
, as
instead
of wasting money for solving uncontrollable environmental issues, encouraging the development of medical sphere seems sensible to me. Undeniably, environmental issues are threatening to humanity, nowadays. But,
this
does not mean that the governments should spend a huge part of their budget for solving them, I opine. To be precise, humanity can not handle environmental barriers, like climate change, global warming and so on regardless of their effort. From my perspective,
therefore
, the states should change their focus towards sectors which they can, actually, deal with while allocating their funds.
For example
, according to the latest research by Monetary Agency of the United States, almost all projects aimed at tackling the environmental problems in the country during the
last
decade, which require huge funds, failed.
Thus
, the states should urgently start focusing on the medical
field
and provide all necessary supplies for every research in the very
field
, I think. By doing so, humanity is likely to find treatments and vaccines for the most of the incurable diseases, which can, in turn, help people to adapt to the recent environmental changes, I believe.
Moreover
, improving and encouraging scientific works in medical sector can open the way to
further
breakthroughs in our life in the future.
That is
to say, investing the part of countries` budget to
this
field
would not be a waste of money.
For instance
, the state of Japan is considered the giant promoter of every medical achievement in the country, which make them highly-ranked country in medicine worldwide. In conclusion, I support the notion of spending the government`s budget on medicine rather than the environment, as a medical
field
seems prosperous for me.
Submitted by Jack Sumner on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: