 It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The historical in local is essential than the global

history

for students. In my opinions, the

history

in local is not vital than the global.

First

of all, the

history

of global can develop students' critical thinking. As students can

gain

different ideas from the

history

not only the local

history

, but

also

care of the globe.

For example

, students can know that the scientists did some experiment in the past that can improve the technological science in different method. It can prove that the

history

in global can develop the idea in every student to

gain

some benefit from it. The local

history

does not have

this

information that there are not enough resources that students can use. Students can use their mind to think about the difference in-between the local and global to improve their critical thinking the daily.

Secondly

, the global

history

can build a culture communication in the mind. Students can know more

history

around the world

instead

of their country. They can learn different habits or lifestyle in a different country.

For instance

, the freedom for the global is stronger than the local. Students can know that the freedom that students can be

gain

Suggestion

gained

from something to become more fair between girls and boys. It is not a rule that the student needs to follow, but students can best use of the

history

Suggestion

historic

historical

resource that can improve their daily and their negative habits. In conclusion, the

history

in local is not vital than the global. Students need to know more about the both side

history

to

gain

more advantages from the

history

. It can improve our thinking in different ways. From the culture and the critical thinking to students, students can know more about what happens in the world without going out to different countries.