It is often argued that mitigating health issues and diseases is better than treating them,
hence
the government should allocate appropriate budgets for it. In my opinion, I completely disagree with Linking Words
this
view.
Linking Words
To begin
with, following a healthy lifestyle, Linking Words
such
as eating the right food, as well as keeping fit and staying in shape is certainly beneficial to fitness and preventing illness. Linking Words
Nonetheless
, there are some diseases that are incurable and occur based on genetics, Linking Words
such
as cancer. Linking Words
For example
, my grandfather led an active and healthy lifestyle, did not smoke and had a good diet, Linking Words
however
, he developed lung cancer when he was 65 years old. Linking Words
Therefore
, I hold the view that finding new ways to treat these kinds of illness is in need of consistent funding which the ministry has a responsibility to budget for.
Linking Words
Secondly
, in many countries, there is a desperate need for investment in health care, especially for the development of new ways to combat serious disease Linking Words
such
as Parkinson's disease. To illustrate Linking Words
this
, in the USA over the past two decades, there have been huge advances in the treatment of Parkinson's with new types of drug, which was the result of several years of investment by administrations. If the regime in other countries had Linking Words
this
at the top of their agenda Linking Words
then
I believe that many more terrible illnesses could ne cured by cutting edge medicine with the Linking Words
next
decade.
To sum up, Linking Words
although
some argued that authority money needs to be set aside for the prevention of well-being problems rather than pharmaceutical and treatment. I firmly believe that funds need to be used for the treatment of serious diseases and the improvement of better pharmaceutical.Linking Words
Md Ridoy Hossain