Introduction
Although
there is no doubt that crime must be punished, it is important to consider which type of the penal systems is most appropriate. While some believe that a Linking Words
system
of fixed sentences should be adopted, I support the view that punishments should be based on motives and circumstances.
Use synonyms
Body · 1
Those who advocate implementing a judicial process of set punishments may argue that
this
would make criminal trials Linking Words
more efficient
. Suggestion
more efficiently
For example
, once a jury has decided a particular defendant is guilty of murder, the judge need only refer to the ‘punishment for murder’ to Linking Words
sentence
that person to life imprisonment. The benefit of Suggestion
the sentence
this
is that a huge amount of time would be saved in court, Linking Words
thus
leading to significant financial savings. Linking Words
As a result
, more money could be spent on healthcare, education and welfare.
Linking Words
Body · 2
However
, I would argue that the above Linking Words
system
is too rigid, and a process of ‘flexible’ punishments is much fairer. The latter punishment Use synonyms
system
, which many countries use, leaves more room for compassion toward offenders who have been blackmailed or manipulated. Use synonyms
For instance
, under Linking Words
this
Linking Words
system
, if a thief is able to prove that he had been bullied into committing his crime, he should be sentenced to less prison time than a thief who had been motivated by greed. If, Use synonyms
instead
, fixed punishments were implemented, Linking Words
this
sense of fairness and morality would be lost.
Linking Words
Conclusion
In conclusion, while a legal
system
of fixed punishments might be more cost-effective and efficient, a procedure of assessing crimes based on circumstances and motives Use synonyms
is
more just, and justice, in my view, is paramount.Suggestion
has been